It does seem a bit odd to be asked to write some ‘historical’ notes about the founding of CITT. After all, we’re not yet twenty years old. Well, I suppose that now makes it older than our youngest… So, here is a brief history of the founding of CITT as seen from the perspective of a member in Toronto who signed some documents, served on the first Board of Directors, and edited CITT’s journal for the first years.
There are many people who can offer other perspectives, details of other aspects of the beginning years of CITT (e.g. the founding of Sections, history of CallBoard, etc.), and corrections of mistakes in my account. Please send them to the CITT office (info@citt.org) so we can improve what has been started below.
The Canadian Institute for Theatre
Technology was formed in 1990, and it was based on the existing Canadian
membership of the United States Institute for Theatre Technology (USITT). USITT
had been formed in 1960 in New York and had established a national presence and
many local sections across the USA and Canada. After some early activity – the
USITT National Conference was actually held in Toronto in 1966 – the sections
in Canada became inactive, leaving a scattering of individual members across
the country.
In 1980, a number of members formed the
Alberta Section of USITT and held their first Annual Conference in May at the
Citadel Theatre. The section started to build its membership over the decade
with a variety of workshops and meetings, eventually hosting the USITT Annual
Conference in Calgary in 1989.
In 1985, the Alberta Section, with the
assistance of the University of Calgary, established an electronic mail and
conferencing system for theatre production people, and soon made it available
to USITT members and theatre professionals everywhere. This was almost a decade
before the World Wide Web and Internet Service Providers (ISPs) made the
Internet generally available to those outside universities, governments, and
large corporations. CallBoard became
the electronic communications backbone of USITT, making the Alberta Section a
leading force in USITT. CallBoard was
also essential to the eventual creation of CITT.
By the late 1980s, CallBoard’s virtual
community – at that time consisting primarily of technical directors and
production managers – linked theatres and theatre schools across the country. We
connected to Datapac lines using 300, 1200 or 2400-baud modems and typed a
variety of Unix-like commands while staring at 12” monochrome monitors or 9”
Mac Classic screens. We answered each other’s technical questions, found
sources of esoteric materials, and nurtured this early online community.
In 1988, a determined group of people in
Toronto revived the moribund Algonquin Section of USITT. The first activity it
sponsored was a tour of the Elgin/Winter Garden complex before its full
historical renovation. The Elgin had undergone some basic refitting to mount Cats, marking the start of the
‘megamusical’ era in Toronto, while the eerie Winter Garden was still
untouched. An ambitious slate of programs were put together, which soon made
the Section one of the most active in USITT. The Algonquin Section started to
form a real presence in the theatre scene in Ontario, particularly in Toronto,
which was already the third-busiest theatre city in the English-speaking world.
Back in Alberta, the dream of a Canadian
organization had been incubating for some time. The addition of a second
functioning Canadian section in Ontario started to make this look feasible. In
1989, Calgary hosted the USITT Annual Conference, the first one held in Canada
since the much more modest affair in Toronto in 1966. This made everyone aware
of the scope of the theatre scene in Alberta, and the strength of the Section. There
was a meeting of Canadian members at this Conference where the formation of a
Canadian institute was discussed, an idea that was warmly encouraged by senior
members of USITT.
A change in the theatrical environment was
making the establishment of a distinctly Canadian organization necessary. At
this time, Canadian theatre people were entering an era of regulation that we
had heretofore escaped. Ask any of the grey hairs around CITT and we can tell
you about a time when it was assumed that labour laws, safety regulations and
electrical codes did not apply to us; we can tell you tales of practices that
would turn your own hair white. This lawless period was coming to an end by the
late 1980s, and it was becoming clear that we would have to take a leading role
part in the regulatory process ourselves if we did not want to be constricted
by irrational and unworkable laws and regulations.
A salutary case occurred in Toronto in 1989. After a number of hold-ups using fake guns and the shooting of at least one suspect brandishing a toy weapon, the City of Toronto brought forward a by-law banning replica weapons. Unfortunately, it was worded in such a way that it could make it easier to get a real gun onstage than even a wooden replica. The Algonquin Section rallied the local film and theatre community to make them aware of the threat, and made a presentation to the City Council that resulted in the exemption for replicas used lawfully in film, television and stage productions.
While the Ontario USITT members were successful in this case, it led to an understanding that the Alberta USITT members had already come to when they had become involved with official bodies: it would be much easier to be effective in these circumstances if it sounded like we were part of a Canadian organization.
The other motivation to create a Canadian
institute was the recognition of the difference in the theatrical cultures
between the USA and Canada, along with the different political and legal
environments, funding models and technical practices (just ask any American
crew that has received a road case from Canada closed down with Robertson
screws).
The membership in the two countries is also
very different, with USITT’s membership and institutional strength based in the
many large American university theatre departments that offer both
undergraduate and graduate degrees. Today, some 70% of USITT’s members hold
graduate degrees. In contrast, there are few graduate theatre programs in Canada,
and not one in Theatre Production even to this day. While universities and
colleges provide a significant portion of the Canadian membership, those
working in professional theatres and in related sales and service companies
easily outnumber the academic members, and provide a very different balance and
focus.
Starting in 1989, the board members of the
Alberta and Algonquin Sections and other interested members started taking
actual steps to create a Canadian institute. Looking back on it, this was a notable
Canadian anomaly: an
Alberta/Ontario alliance featuring an established outfit from Calgary and
Edmonton working with a bunch of upstarts from Toronto. Apart from a number of
meetings, there were a lot of forum discussions and emails and files flying
back and forth on CallBoard. The
directors and executive of USITT also provided a lot of help and
encouragement.
Formal letters of incorporation were drawn
up and shipped across the country for signatures in May of 1990. They were
signed by Normand Bouchard, Patricia Christensen and Ken Hewitt in Alberta, and
by James Carnrite, Paul Court and Graham Frampton in Toronto. This was approved
by the Canadian Department of Consumer and Corporate affairs in July, to take
effect on August 1st.
We still had to work out a lot of details
of how CITT would be run. While we were all USITT members and were going to
fulfill essentially the same mandate, we didn’t feel that the American
institute necessarily provided appropriate models for a Canadian institute. We decided
to get as many members together as possible and hammer out the details in one
busy weekend.
On the weekend of September 14 and 15, 1990, some seventy members from across the country arrived for the founding conference of the Canadian Institute for Theatre Technology at the Carlton Place Hotel in Toronto. Most of the members had been talking and working together via CallBoard for some time, but were now meeting many of these colleagues and friends face-to-face for the first time – this even applied to some of the signatories of the incorporation documents. This would not be unusual today, but in 1990 this marked CITT as an organization that made exceptional use of electronic communication.
This ‘pre-CITT’ conference started to set the tone for the annual conferences to come. There was a ‘backstage’ tour of the Skydome (now the Rogers Centre), a presentation of plans for the new Ballet-Opera House (not the one that was finally opened sixteen years later), and many people went to see The Phantom of the Opera, which was one year into its ten-year Toronto run. There were plenty of unofficial gatherings in bars and restaurants, with various corporate members inaugurating the fine tradition of picking up the tab for lots of these meetings.
The real work of the putting the
organization together happened in a few hours. The members split into a number
of working groups and defined the basic building blocks of CITT:
The basic membership categories were
similar to those that exist today, with the exception of the Associate
membership, which was soon dropped. Initially, there were two classes of
membership: National and International. The International membership was a
combined membership in both CITT and USITT and was available for the first
decade or so of CITT’s existence.
The most significant decision concerning
membership – one that departed significantly from the practice of USITT – was
the decision that any member of a Regional Section would automatically become a
National member of CITT, and any National member would automatically become a
member of any existing Regional Section – or would become a member if a new
Section were created. The
automatic combination of Regional and National memberships has kept the national
organization viable. It has also made it much easier to create new Sections in
British Columbia, Québec and the Atlantic Provinces once the National
memberships in those areas grew to support a Section.
Our membership structure reflects the fact
that Canadian Theatre people often work in different parts of the country
during their careers, and that most members wanted to be part of an
organization with a national perspective. It also reflects the role CITT and CallBoard have played in giving us a sense
of being part of a Canadian industry.
The Finance Committee hammered together the
nuts and bolts of a financial structure that would keep the new organization
working – and capable of facing an annual audit. This included setting the
costs for the various types of membership. All funds would come to the National
Office, which would then remit money to the Sections, based on membership. Money
would also be sent to USITT for International membership and for USITT
publications, which would be bulk shipped to Calgary and then distributed in
Canada by CITT. The National Office would be headquartered with the Alberta
Section office at the University of Calgary, which was also the home of CallBoard.
A suggestion had been made that CITT start
with the modest strategy of distributing Sightlines, the USITT journal, with
the addition of some Canadian articles. Brasher heads prevailed, and it was
decided to create a national journal that would also take over the function of
the current newsletters of the Alberta and Algonquin sections. We agreed that
many of the articles in the Section newsletters actually addressed topics of
national interest. The format of the current Algonquin Section Newsletter would
be used, along with its editor. The new publication would have the imaginative
title of ‘CITT Newsletter’.
The mandate for the Newsletter was to
create a printed voice for the members across the country. Letters, articles
and opinions were received from all over – usually via CallBoard. Advertising copy was received as graphic files or
scanned in. Each issue was edited and laid out in Toronto (in Pagemaker 3
originally) and then the file was sent to the Calgary office for printing and
distribution. The first issues
were sent via a 1200-baud modem and the file transfer could take six hours – if
nothing froze. At a meeting of OISTAT editors from around the world in 1991,
they listened open-mouthed to the technical details of our sophisticated
operation: most of them were not
even using computers for layout at this point. Of course, none of them had the
incentive of living in a country where the national highway was 8,000 kilometers
long.
Computers, software and modems were
eventually upgraded. Many people contributed and corporate members supported us
with advertising. Five years on, we could claim that 30% of the membership had
contributed to at least one issue. In 1994, the Newsletter was reformatted and
its name changed to ‘StageWorks’. This eventually became the electronic
publication we have today.
It’s interesting to note that, even at this
first Publications Committee meeting in 1990, the idea of a strictly electronic
CITT publication was put forward. At that time, this would have involved making
a CallBoard subscription an automatic
part of CITT membership (which did not actually happen for another eighteen
years). This was not going to happen at that time because not every member had
access to a computer or modem (remember, those things that squealed when you
connected?) The matter of file format was also a problem, as this was years
before the creation of the ubiquitous and platform-independent HTML and PDF
file formats. The discussion kept on popping up as graphic interfaces became
the standard and Internet access became practically universal. In 2003, the
electronic version of StageWorks
became available simultaneously with the printed publication, and the print
version was finally dropped in 2005.
The interim Board of Directors was appointed by the two Sections, and this board elected the following executive:
Tim Clinton continued running CallBoard and Paul Court became editor of the CITT Newsletter.
The creation of CITT was encouraged and
aided by the Board of Directors and Executive of USITT from the beginning, and the two sister organizations have
maintained close ties. USITT’s President Donald Shulman and Treasurer Christine
Kaiser attended the founding conference in Toronto, and senior members of USITT
have been attending CITT Conferences ever since. Normand Bouchard of Calgary
has been a senior member of USITT for two decades, was active in founding CITT,
and has been the chief liaison between the two Institutes.
Initially, all CITT members received USITT’s journal, Sightlines, and an International membership in both organizations existed for a number of years. Eventually, CITT stopped distributing USITT publications in Canada and discontinued the International membership as it became simpler for each organization to deal with its own members. Nevertheless, while the ties between the two are no longer quite as obvious as they used to be, many CITT members still find it worthwhile to maintain a membership in USITT as well. The Ontario Section (which is also USITT’s Algonquin Section) played host to two of the largest USITT Annual Conferences and Stage Expos in 1999 and 2005.
On November 1st, 1990, all USITT
National members in Canada and all members of the Alberta and Algonquin
Sections became members of the Canadian Institute for Theatre Technology, “The
Canadian Association Serving Design and Production Professionals in the
Performing Arts”. CITT took on all membership administration and distribution
of publications in Canada. It also took on new members and distributed the
first issue of the CITT Newsletter that month. We were off and running.
Apart from mentioning people who took on specific functions I did not give much credit to the individuals who did so much work in the beginning and in the early years: I simply feared that I would fail to give all the credit that is due. Nevertheless, from my perspective in Toronto there are two people from Calgary without whom CITT would not have come into existence as soon as it did: Ken Hewitt, our first President, who was the visionary and driving force behind its creation; and Tim Clinton, who developed and ran CallBoard – which became the vital backbone of CITT – from 1985 to July of 2009. Of all the organizations that have provided support, special mention must be made of the University of Calgary, which provided the institutional and logistical base for CallBoard and the early years of CITT.
Paul Court, August 2009